Photo by The Conmunity (https://www.flickr.com/photos/popculturegeek/4554021738/) |
Recently, in certain literary circles, there’s been a lot of chatter
about the future of the short story. Some feel that we’re seeing a resurgence of the
short form, citing the phenomenal success of George Saunders as proof. Others
feel that the popularity of stories has steadily declined in recent years. In
his generally positive introduction to The Penguin Book of the British Short
Story, even Philip Hensher was forced to admit that ‘reading short stories
rewarded by competitions, I was struck by present-tense solitary reflections,
often with characters lying on their beds affectlessly pondering… There was
nothing there at all, apart from a fervent desire to win £30,000.’
What everyone appears to agree on is the fact that
publishers don’t know what to do with short stories. Occasionally the larger
publishers will humour an established author – Hilary Mantel, Lionel Shriver –
by allowing them a collection between the novels, but you’re unlikely to see
many debuts. New authors are finding that only the smaller, independent presses
are willing to take a punt on their genius.
The same is also true of anthologies, as I found myself,
when I edited Being Dad: Short Stories About Fatherhood last year – but
thankfully, help may be on the way. More and more publishers seem to be turning
to crowdfunding as a viable option, and in particular it’s something that seems
to be working for the humble anthology. Might there be a future for the short
story after all?
In many ways, my experience with Being Dad was fairly
typical. Several medium-to-large publishers expressed an interest, but said
that anthologies ‘didn’t sell’ (how they would know this when they don’t
actually publish any is one of life’s great mysteries). Eventually I secured
the interest of Bristol-based Tangent Books, who had the foresight to see that
this was a book which had both a market and some great stories. There was one
proviso: we had to raise the initial costs via crowdfunding.
I’ll admit, at first I was reluctant – but when it came to
the crunch there were few options. I also liked Tangent’s enthusiasm for the
project, and the way they conducted their business. I therefore launched a
campaign on Kickstarter to raise the necessary capital to get the book off the
ground.
I won’t go into the details here, but suffice it to say that
it was a long and arduous process. What struck me most forcibly, however, was
the interest we were receiving – and not just from people we knew. Yes, many of
my friends and family backed the book, for which I’m hugely grateful. But we
received pledges from complete strangers too – some of them extremely generous
– and in the final accounting these made up more than half the total. We were
able to pre-sell much of the first print run in this way, and the project very
quickly went into profit.
My experience is by no means unique, either. Unsung Stories
are currently crowdfunding 2084, an anthology of short stories inspired by
George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, and they’ve had a resounding success.
Their funding goal was reached within eleven hours of the campaign launching,
and they’re now up to over £8000 as I write this, more than three times their
original goal.
I asked George Sandison at Unsung Stories why they’d decided
to crowdfund the book, and this is what he had to say:
‘One of the things an anthology gives you, that a single-author book doesn't, is a chance to reach the fans of every author involved. Between support from contributors with promoting the launch, and a larger group of people who may be interested in the project, you've got a healthy customer base to call on. And one of the things crowdfunding does really well, is get people involved in a project - they get their name in the book, collectible editions, artwork, special stuff they'll want to keep. So combine those two things and you have a lot of people, who are empowered and made part of the process. Quite literally, they help make the book.’
This is what I’d found too, and it suggests that there’s a
very real business model that’s starting to emerge. Anthologies benefit from
having several authors involved, with their combined fan bases – they are also
able to spread their appeal more widely. Having one or two well-established
authors on board can also make it more appealing, especially to an audience
that might not have taken a chance on the lesser-known writers.
Of course, it’s not just anthologies that are reaping the
benefits of crowdfunding. Independent presses in general are gradually coming
to realise its advantages, and many now have a success story to tell. Influx
Press recently crowdfunded their own anthology, The Unreliable Guide to London,
which has gone on to receive critical acclaim (it’s currently shortlisted for Best
Anthology at this year’s Saboteur Awards, an accolade that I’m proud to say
went to Being Dad last year). At the moment, they’re undertaking a more general
crowdfunding project, however, raising funds to support the business’s growth.
This campaign is already enjoying phenomenal success, and is well worth
checking out. Dead Ink and Dodo Ink have also turned to crowdfunding to get
projects off the ground in recent years, and all are going from strength to
strength.
Interestingly, Unbound enjoyed a huge crowdfunded success with Nikesh
Shukla’s The Good Immigrant last year too. While this was non-fiction, rather
than fiction, it once again suggested that crowdfunding works for multi-author
projects. I’ve since been told that Unbound will no longer consider
anthologies, a decision that seems to undermine the idea of crowdfunding
anthologies as a strong business model. It starts to make sense, however, when
you bear in mind that Unbound are now part of the Penguin Random House
behemoth. Clearly the mainstream publishing mantra that ‘anthologies don’t
sell’ has already seeped through to the Unbounders.
Within the independent field, though, the anthology may
actually be thriving, and crowdfunding is looking more and more like the way forward.
Yes, short stories are a niche market – but they’re a market nonetheless. By
targeting and actively involving readers who have an interest in short fiction,
projects like Unsung’s 2084 are looking remarkably prescient, a glimpse into
what the future might hold for anthologists everywhere. Publishers would do well
to look to crowdfunding when they’re considering turning an anthology down. The
market is still out there – you just have to search for it in the crowd.
Comments
Post a Comment